Washington,
28
November
2017
|
07:00 PM
America/New_York

Arctic Refuge Drilling Approaches Senate Floor

WASHINGTON ­­– The United States Senate will likely vote on its version of the federal tax reform reconciliation bill this week, which includes a damaging provision that would open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil drilling.

If the Senate passes this tax bill, the forthcoming conference of the Senate and House versions will be the last opportunity for lawmakers to remove oil drilling in the Arctic refuge from the final legislation.

Jamie Rappaport Clark, president and CEO of Defenders of Wildlife, issued the following statement:

“A vote for the Senate tax reform bill is a vote supporting the destruction of America’s iconic Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

“Sen. Murkowski’s toxic drilling provision forsakes the conservation values that helped shape our nation and threatens polar bears, muskoxen, caribou and hundreds of species of migratory birds from all fifty states. Congress must uphold America’s conservation legacy by rejecting any bill that includes oil drilling in the Arctic refuge.”

Background

The Importance of the Arctic Refuge

  • The coastal plain, where drilling would occur, is the biological heart of the refuge. Oil development would irreparably damage this vital landscape. The wilderness and habitat values of the coastal plain would be forever destroyed by an industrial complex, replete with oil spills, leaks and pollution. Pipelines, drill rigs, buildings and other infrastructure accompanied by the noise of industrial development would threaten iconic wildlife and imperil sensitive species that call the refuge home.
  • The Arctic refuge contains vital nesting habitat for hundreds of species of migratory birds from all 50 states and six continents; the most important onshore denning habitat for threatened polar bears in the United States; spawning streams for Dolly Varden and other valued fish species; and room to roam for caribou, wolves, muskoxen, Dall sheep, Arctic foxes and many other wildlife species.
  • Most of the Arctic refuge’s coastal plain is designated critical habitat for the federally threatened polar bear. Mother polar bears with cubs are increasingly dependent on this area as annual sea ice melts more quickly due to a warming climate. The coastal plain is also the principal calving ground for the nearly 200,000-strong Porcupine caribou herd, which migrates hundreds of miles to birth and raise their young in the refuge each year.
  • President Dwight D. Eisenhower first set aside much of the refuge in 1960. Congress later affirmed and expanded the refuge in the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) in 1980. Now about the size of South Carolina, the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge preserves one of the largest intact ecosystems in the world. Approximately 40 percent of the refuge, mostly in the Brooks Range, is designated as wilderness to help permanently protect this treasured landscape.

Sacrificing a National Treasure Behind Closed Doors

  • Because his contentious drilling legislation is attached to the tax reform reconciliation bill, it has bypassed a filibuster in the Senate.
  • Tucking this legislation into the budget process violates regular order and precludes full public discussion of this issue. Adding such a high-profile, divisive provision to the tax reform bill has nothing to do with tax reform and circumvents full and fair debate in the Congress.
  • Industrializing America’s greatest national wildlife refuge deserves full public debate. Two out of three Americans support protecting the Arctic refuge.

A Budget Scam

  • The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge drilling provision is about changing policy, not raising revenue. It should not have been included in the budget process and should not be included in an unrelated tax reform bill.
  • Refuge drilling would produce scant revenue to the U.S. Treasury, and nothing close to the projected $1.8 billion suggested by the president’s current budget proposal. A recent economic analysis by the Center for American Progress found that Arctic refuge drilling would only raise $37.5 million for the U.S. Treasury, at most, in the first decade. In fact, oil leasing in the refuge would only produce a paltry $7.5 million, if Alaska successfully sues to claim 90 percent of leasing revenues available under applicable law.
  • The FY2018 budget resolution passed by Congress would increase the federal debt by $1.5 trillion – meaning that the sale of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge leases and royalties would recoup a fraction of one percent of the projected deficit in the "best case" scenario. That calculation generously assumes that every single acre of the coastal plain would be sold for drilling, which is highly unlikely.

###

Defenders of Wildlife is dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities. With nearly 1.2 million members and activists, Defenders of Wildlife is a leading advocate for innovative solutions to safeguard our wildlife heritage for generations to come. For more information, visit Newsroom.Defenders.org and follow us on Twitter @DefendersNews.